英語辯論賽辯論稿

時間：2020-11-20 13:32:05 辯論賽

英語辯論賽辯論稿范文

　　辯論賽是一門藝術，是一種融口才、邏輯、風度、幽默、表演為一體的競技項目，下面是小編搜集整理的英語辯論賽辯論稿，歡迎閱讀。更多資訊請繼續關注辯論賽欄目!

英語辯論賽辯論稿范文

　　英語辯論賽辯論稿1

　　Good evening，Ladies and gentlemen.

　　According to the law, every single individual is born with the right to keep living. Since death is just a part of life, to suggest that it is a right is to grant that it is a freedom to decide when and where to give up this kind of right. In a manner of speaking, it is a man’s right to commit suicide.

　　Again, we can find in the OXFord Advanced Learner’s English-Chinese dictionary the explanation of “suicide”----the act of killing oneself intentionally----which indicates that suicide is simply a libertarian movement for human freedom and the right of making choices. It is the law’s duty to protect human’s freedom and the right of making choices.

　　While it is without doubt that suicide, in reality, is human’s right, there main argument remain:

　　1,Maybe some people will say that the primary purpose of human being is to live, so suicide is inhumane and totally against the standard of ethic;

　　2,Suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person;

　　3,The people who commits suicide is irrespondsable to those who love him, even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself.

　　However, an evidence to sustain the first argument is difficult to obtain.It is common sense to note that Modern medicine has its own limitation and can not cure all the existing diseases.In spite of the extraordinary progress made in Modern medicine, problems remain in terms of guaranteeing that all the pains due to illness can be reduced to a tolerant level. As a result of this, at least in the near future, there must be some illnesses which can not be treated, some pains which are uncontrollable, some people who are terminally ill. Maybe the primary purpose of an ordinary and healthy human being is to live, but what if the person we are talking about is a terminally ill patient whose remaining time is no more than a series of suffering . Neither the law nor medical ethics requires “everything be done” to keep a person alive. However, insistnece, against the patient’s wishes, that death be postponed by every means available is contrary to law and practice. It would also be cruel and inhumane. There comes a time when continued attempts to cure are not compassionate, wise or medically sound. That’s where only euthanasia can be of use. Voluntary euthanasia,which is another form of suicide, is human, because it brings mental and physical release to the patient and his family and helps to put an ultimate end to the torment of a termnally ill patient by hastening his death when he has no prospect of recovering. Extending an incurably sick patient’s life means the same as aggravating the pain . It is unnecessory to maintain life artificially beyond the point when people will never regain consciousness. Because effort should not be made to perpetuate what has become a meanless existence.

　　Others may argue that “suicide is criminal offense because it involves the killing of a person”. Indeed, killing another person is a kind of serious criminal offense which we call “murder”. However, what we are talkig about is “suicide”, not “murder”. Do they realise there is a big difference between the lives of our own and the lives of other people? Since it is our own life, we have the right to decide in what way the life meets its end. If not ,what is the difference gonna be? For instance, you are guity of keeping other people’s possession without permition. Because you are stealing the things which do not belong to you. But when it comes to your own possession, that it is to say, when you keep your own possession or even use it in a way that will probably destroy it,no one would consider you as guity.So, Sustaining the idea of “suicide is criminal offense” is as ridiculous as saying that a person is guity of using his own possession in a destructive way. In the case of suicide, there is no victims, let alone the so-called criminal offense.

　　With regard to the last argument----”the people who commit suicide ,even if it is a physical and mental realse to himself, is irresponsable to the people who really love him”----the argument itself, ironically is in some sense to abmit that suicide is a physical and mental realse. But what they fail to realise is that the kind of release is not just to the one who commit suicide, but also to his family.It is a terminally sick patient’s right as well as duty to put an utimate end to the torment of himself and his family. Because he is the reason of all the suffering. Those who choose suicide are a class of people whose remaining time is nothing but simply suffering, a class of people who choose death as an ultimate escape from the eternal torture they are destined to ,a class of people who need compassion and understanding from their relatives and the society, rather than meanlessly prolonging his painful life. If we really love the one who commit suicide, we should let him die in a desired way, die with dignity as he wishes. Because this is where true love lies.

　　Judging from what has been discussed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that we should make suicide legalized. Because it’s a new and bitter truth we must learn to face.

　　That’s all.Thank you.

　　英語辯論賽辯論稿2

　　Good morning everyone.Today I’m happy to make a discussion about paper book and E-book with you. After our team seriously thinking and discussion,we agree that paper book is still the first s

　　election when people decide to read.經過我們團隊認真思考和討論，大家一致認

　　為，紙書依然是當人們決定要讀取的第一個選擇。

　　That means,though E-book has appeared for many years and its market is growing rapidly,paper book still occupy the first place.這意味著，盡管電子圖書已經出現了許多

　　年，其市場正很快，紙質書仍然占據第一的位置。

　　Therefore,our group choose to support paper book.When compared with E-book, paper book has its natural advantages.因此，我們小組選擇支持的紙質書。當與電子書相

　　比，紙書有其天然的優勢。

　　Firstly,traditional culture take paper book as its carrier,this also makes traditional reading has become a habit for most people.首先，傳統文化采取紙質圖書為載體，這也

　　使得傳統閱讀對大多數人來說已經成為一種習慣。

　　We all know that once a habit developed,it will be hard to change.我們都知道，一旦習

　　慣開發的，這將是很難改變。

　　It also illustrates that the status of paper book is still hard to shake by E-book and the soul and essence of paper book are also impossible to be replaced by E-book.這也說

　　明了紙書的地位還是難以通過電子書來動搖靈魂和紙書的.精華，也不可能被電子書取代。

　　Traditional reading helps us cultivate abstract thinking ability,by contrast,E-book looks like a kind of fast food culture which lacks of depth and aftertaste.傳統的閱讀能

　　幫助我們培養抽象思維能力，相比之下，電子書看起來就像是一種快餐文化，而缺乏深度和回味。

　　Secondly,E-book isn’t really conductive to collection,collection of books is also a kind of collection of culture and a historical accumulation at the same time.其次，電子書是

　　不是真的利于收藏，收藏的書籍也是一種集文化，并在同一時間一個歷史積淀。

　　So,one day in the future,if what we can see in museum is not ancient books but electronic readers,such as kindle,CD,removing storage devices,don’t tell me that you still have interesting to visit.于是，有一天，在未來，如果我們能在博物館看到的是不是古

　　代的書籍，但電子閱讀器，如點燃，CD，刪除存儲設備，不要告訴我，你還有興趣訪問。

　　So,as far as I’m concerned,a electronic reader is always a cold machine,it cann’t bring us warm feeling like paper book.所以，就我而言，一個電子閱讀器始終是一個冰冷的機器，

　　它無法帶給我們像紙書溫暖的感覺。

　　To sum up,we choose to support paper book is a right choice. 綜上所述，我們選擇支持

　　紙書是一個正確的選擇。

【英語辯論賽辯論稿范文】相關文章：

關于大學生辯論賽的辯論技巧-辯論賽12-27